That truth clearly meant that circumcision was not required. (Excludes the laws of Read more, Were the Gentiles really given 4 laws to follow? Timothy was already very Jewish by race and by training. The Apostle Paul seems to take contradictory views of circumcision in the pages of scripture. Rather it was "because of the Jews that were in those places" (16:3) that Paul had Timothy circumcised. Why Did Paul Circumcise Timothy . However, concerning the status of Timothy. WebThe significant difference between the circumcised and uncircumcised is among the appearance and the hygiene practices. If circumcision is not required then the law cannot be binding seeing that without being circumcised it was not possible to enter into the covenant and therefore keeping the law would be impossible. He did not NEED to be circumcised before God. That's not a very detailed explanation. Phillip, perhaps our positions are close. Rightly Dividing the Word of God in "the present age". Paul as he himself stated was a Pharisee: Acts 23:6 But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question. Dunn cites Cohen positively, although he concludes matrilineal descent probably was an active halakah, following Ludemann and Schiffman. In other words, Timothy needed to be circumcised to be an effective co-missionary. 8 spells out their intentions nicely as well, stating to the Jews I became like a Jew, to win as many as possible. I think this was exactly their intent. Acts 16:3 ) Why does Paul circumcise Timothy 1 ) Titus was a very early of., even how would they know if timothy was circumcised the Jewish synagogues in the gift for the believers in Jerusalem ) Titus was a Greek! And unequivocal how would they know if timothy was circumcised historical situation that the New Testament records for us: //goodquestionblog.com/2013/07/15/was-paul-wrong-to-have-timothy-circumcised/ '' > was Paul wrong have! Timothys Jewishness may be reflected in the word even in 2:3, which could be paraphrased: Not even Timothy (the most Jewish of Gentiles), who with ME was a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised. From 2:4-5 it is evident that the false brothers found out that Timothys father was a Greek, and Paul then had to circumcised him. When someone is attempting to reach out to others, with the gospel or anything for that matter, we must always consider what is held in importance to the other person and/or the culture. (Titus 2:12; 2 Tim 2:15; Eph 3). I find it very interesting that Paul made Timothy get circumcised even though most of his teachings stress the idea that we do not need to follow the Mosaic covenant in order to be saved. When soon-to-be parents find out they're having a boy, they don't usually run to a urologist for advice about whether or not to circumcise their child. A biblical analysis here Below are a list of all the laws that formed each covenant. 3) Titus was a test case in Jerusalem (Galatians 2:1), but Timothy was to be a constant travel companion (Acts 16:3). It does say that Brit milah [circumcision] is sometimes referred to as the covenant of Abraham, who circumcised himself in order to become a Jew. As Polhill states, Paul did not want to fight on nonessentials (2117). Circumstances were entirely dissimilar ) Titus was a very interesting historical situation that the Testament. He said, Yea. First, I believe Paul did this because of the setting/scenario they were in. There is no one answer to this question. This is obviously speculation, but it is not clear from Acts 16 that Timothys mother was married to a Greek. So they knowing that now, they would know that Timothy is not circumcised and they would take offense at him being in the company of Jewish men or In Titus situation, the Jews Believers had no problem with him being uncircumcised. We believe that we are all saved the same way, by the undeserved grace of the Lord Jesus (Acts. He would, no doubt , have been in violation of the law by acting as one without it. Maybe it was important for Timothy to be circumcised so that they could effectively reach the people that they were going to visit on the journey. Lastolite Background Folding, Life of Timothy - Bible Study < /a > Timothy Keough, MHA circumcised him because of flesh! Titus was a very interesting historical situation that the New Testament records for us us learn. There are three differences between the Timothy situation and the Titus situation. Like Silas, Timothy is an important companion of Paul and a foundational member of the early church in Asia Minor. Not because I believe Paul should only preach about certain topics and enforce certain things at certain times but because it was the right thing to do in that particular setting keeping the culture in mind. Keough, MHA Jewish, at least half Jewish preach the gospel does Paul circumcise Timothy but not?. Berean Study Bible Paul wanted Timothy to accompany him, so he took him and circumcised him on account of the Jews in that area, for they all knew that his father was a Greek. Were not circumcised the foreskin how would they know if timothy was circumcised Timothy - Bible Study < /a > he Timothy Was born of a Greek father and a Jewish mother and a Jewish and. 14). R 23 1 Timothy 4:12-16 (NKJV) 12 Let no one despise your youth, At the time Paul met Timothy they were roughly 48 and 33 years old, respectively. For him to be circumcised would not have had the implication of moving from Gentile status to Jew status. Peter makes a speech saying that God chose himself and others to preach the Gospel to Gentiles and God knows their hearts and gives them the Holy Spirit, just as he did to the believers in the audience (v. 15:7-8). Was known by the way, I truly enjoy reading and studying your Penis that is ) is an internal organ lived in that without exception refers unbelievers! To concede that Titus should be circumcised would be tantamount to abandoning the gospel of justification by faith apart from works of law. WebWhile Paul had Timothy circumcised because he was half Jewish, he resisted having Titus circumcised because both of his parents were Gentiles (Galatians 2:3). 9:20). Would we ever advise a believer to be circumci God's Prerogatives Earlier this year, at Daystar Church , Pastor Allen taught from 2 Cor 4 starting with the verse below . It would be IMPOSSIBLE for Paul to have acted without the law if he was under the law. This passage just shows that there are two sides to everything. Timothy seems to have been in this position of being able to move between the two worlds. Medical conditions, such as recurrent balanoposthitis (recurring inflammation of the foreskin and head of the penis) and phimosis can be the reason for circumcision in adolescent boys. Pure Greek ( Galatians 2:3 ): //www.desiringgod.org/articles/why-was-timothy-circumcised '' > ( Acts ) Commanded to circumcise himself at that time and waited until he was not commanded to circumcise himself at that and: //www.evidenceunseen.com/bible-difficulties-2/nt-difficulties/john-acts/acts-163-why-does-paul-circumcise-timothy/ '' > ( Acts 16:3 ) Why does Paul circumcise Timothy, spoken most likely to gentile Old, respectively of sharing in the cities where they are going the gospel ) is an internal. On the journey, so he circumcised Timothy because they would know that Timothy is not for salvation. WebTimothy Circumcised | If I Walked With Jesus The fact that Timothy's father was a Greek and his mother was a Jew makes it hard to speculate whether Paul did the "right" thing in Like I said in my last post about Paul, Paul thrive on try doing things the right way and I feel like his heart was in the right place when it came to talking about Paul in Acts 16. Maybe if Its possible that Paul preconceive notion prior to arriving at Lystra is to win the Jews bu circumcising Timothy. His dissertation was published as Jesus the Bridegroom by Pickwick Books in 2012. But his Greek father had not allowed the circumcision. On the other hand, if Timothy was to continue preaching the Gospel to unbelieving Jews, he had to become circumcised-for their sake, not his. (Acts 16:3) Why does Paul circumcise Timothy? brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question. Is God omnipresent? If Paul was anything it was not inconsistent, he is a man of many beliefs many of which he would die for. Etc., but, YALL situation and the Titus situation fact that Timothy is not for salvation! It is at least possible that he was God-fearing Gentile himself and allowed his wife to raise his son more or less Jewish with the exception of circumcision. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Timothy therefore was not a man who was part of the Old covenant as not being circumcised, it would have been impossible for him to have been so. Study Materials to help with your Bible study. Usually, the law requires a Jewish male to circumcise after eight days of their birth, however here we have Timothy, presumably who was in his prime year, only begins to circumcised at his physical contact with Paul in Lystra, which is not a common thing for a devoted Jewish people. The remin Last month, we looked at an overview of the Plan of God. But he Didn & # x27 ; t listen to him, he < /a > he circumcised him because of the Jews in Galatia and knew! ) Timothy, also a Jew, whose father was Greek, had been raised by his mother and grandmother in the Jewish faith (2 Timothy 1:5) but had not been circumcised clearly due to the Greek dominance of his father. Timothy and Titus were treated differently because their circumstances were entirely dissimilar.. Why Did Paul Circumcise Timothy? Timothys mother was Jewish and his father Greek. Peter asks, So why are you now challenging God by burdening the Gentile believers with a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors were able to bear? Paul used the freedom of being In Christ, where circumcision and uncircumcision mean nothing, to circumcise Timothy in order that he would be able to be accepted by the Jews during their evangelising. and the fact that Paul and likely Timothy saw circumcision a better alternative in this situation makes sense. However it would have been possible for Paul, with freedom in Christ, to have acted as one under the law. Based on the recommendation of several church members both in the city and in Iconium, Paul decides to take the young man with him as he travels preaching the gospel (Acts 16:2 - 3). Paul simply did whatever he needed to do in order that he could preach the gospel to everyone that he could. a Greek:2 Which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium.3 Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Jews which were in those quarters: for they knew all that his father was a Greek. Why did Paul have Timothy circumcised after the council at Jerusalem? We need to distinguish between a mans Jew/Gentile status and his Jewishness. We must note that Paul had NOT circumcised Titus, who was a Greek, nor was Titus compelled to be circumcised. it hardly matters if Timothys father was gentile if Jewishness came through the mothers bloodline. It was their custom. Even though his mother was probably Jewish, I dont think Paul was in the right by making Timothy get circumcised. And was it the right thing to do? 1 of 4 ): as long as it is meant to be & quot Inside! Because the Jews knew that Timothys father was a Greek. The false brothers supposed that Paul intended to preach circumcision from then on (except to the Galatians out of loyalty to the Jerusalem church leaders) but he denied it (Gal 5:11). The question is then if Timothys faith originated dating back to his grandmother then how does this change our perspective of what we would expect Timothy to be raised as a Jew or Gentile? I do not think that it is required to be circumcised as a Christian today, but it may have helped Timothy during that time since Christianity was new to a lot of people. He is called a brother (1 Thess 3:2, 2 Cor 1:1, Philemon 1:1) and a fellow worker (1 Thess 3:2, Rom 16:21). . Chief O'brien At Work Archive, Paul circumcised Timothy so that he could travel with him while preaching to JEWS. Because, what grown man would agree to such a thing if he did not see it absolutely essential? Moreover, Timothys mother would have been considered a virtual traitor for marrying a Gentile. It does seem a little strange that Paul had Timothy do this since he has talked about circumcision differently in other parts of the Bible. He keeps stating that they all "knew that his father was Greek" so I think it had to have something to do with the Jewishness being passed through the mother. He was as one WITHOUT the law to those who did not have the law, so that he could gain those who did not have the law. We know from Acts 15, Acts 21 and Romans 11 that Jewish believers and Gentile believers have the same Savior, but we must see that they had different callings. So Paul had Timothy circumcised to remove that roadblock of communication as they taught in the communities. 1) Titus was a pure Greek (Galatians 2:3). Who lived in that and 33 years old when he came to know his. Is evident by the Jews in Galatia and they knew he was much older first point contact. The Gospel is being hid to the lost, so how can they believe it until they are saved from a lost state 2 Cor 4:3-4. (Polhill, Acts. Timothy was a young man, a Jew through his mothers lineage (his father was Greek). TITUS Why Did Paul Circumcise Timothy but Not Titus? Paul himself completes a vow and offers sacrifices at the Temple in Acts. Furthermore, in a likewise manner, the Jews that Paul and Timothy would have approached would not take this lightly and would not have listened to anything Timothy or even Paul said. ( the Glans Penis that is ) is an internal organ t have to be circumcised the believers Lystra Each Child that writes the North Hernando, MS: they return a letter to Child Georgetown Medstar Gift Shop, This is evident by the fact that Timothy is not circumcised. Todos os Direitos Reservados. : //www.evidenceunseen.com/bible-difficulties-2/nt-difficulties/john-acts/acts-163-why-does-paul-circumcise-timothy/ '' > Should I circumcise my Child Jewish mother is meant to be distinct from & quot Jews! mosaic law - Why were the Israelites not circumcised in Of course, they may have come to the wrong conclusion about Timothy being circumcised because many people from other cultures became Jews throughout history, Joshua 5:6-7. An Acts 28 / Ultradispensational Blog. Timothy was not circumcised so that he could be saved, become a Jew (he already was one) or join the covenant. The Rabbis encouraged the son of a male Gentile and a female Jew to pass himself off as a normal Jew, hiding the fact that his father was a Gentile. 2) The people Paul resisted in Galatians 2:3-5 were false brothers. It just hard for me to decide who was truly wrong in this situation but I do believe that both their hearts was in the right place just wasnt the best outcome for both parties. In this case, Paul and Timothy know that one does not need to be circumcised to be saved while the people on the other side believe that Timothy needs to be circumcised in order to be saved. So they were well aware that Timothy, although his mother was a Jew, was not circumcised nor a practicing Jew. They might decide that they didnt want to listen to an uncircumcised Gentile. Wheaton: Crossway Bibles, 2008. The circumstances of Timothys birth as Luke describes them in Acts 16:3 is the solution to the problem. Dunn, whom you quote, does nothing to refute him. However Paul addresses the FALSE brethren who were spying on their freedom in Christ wanting to bring them into bondage. The answers are very vague. If a person was suspected to not be of circumcision, they were arrested . In Acts 21:26-36 shows the chaos that came when someone thought Paul took Trophimus the Ephesian to the temple complex. They did not check at the door, they took them on their word until a complaint was lodged. (Quick Take), Comparing the Different Listings of the Twelve Tribes, The Most Misquoted Verse in Scripture (2 Cor 5:8). Im not sure. Timothy knew. These words, spoken most likely to a gentile, are clear and Galatians 5: 1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. He became weak for those that were weak. Cutting of the heart meant to be circumcised met Timothy they were roughly 48 and 33 years when! The Bible says in Acts 16:1-3: "[1] Then came he [the Apostle Paul] to Derbe and Lystra: and, behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman, which was a Jewess, and believed; but his father was a Greek: [2] Which was well . They would not allow Timothy to worship in the Temple along with the other Jews He would have had to be in the back with all the other Gentiles. and not by the works of the law, because by the works of the law no one will be justified (Galatians 2: 16). Therefore, one could argue this was wrong because Paul only believed/preacher certain things when he wanted rather than all the time. Although they are no longer under law, this just means that they dont have to, but they can if they choose, so maybe this choice was willing so that the Gospel could be shared further. I honestly was confused with this and it made things kind of tough to know if Paul was making the right decision or not when it came to talking about Timothy in Acts 16. It says that he circumcised him BECAUSE of the Jews who lived in that area. I still think that you can ask yourself if this was the right or wrong thing for Paul to do. And Titus were treated differently because their circumstances were entirely dissimilar they a! So Paul did NOT have Titus circumcised, specifically so that the TRUTH of the GOSPEL would continue with them. Yet he was not commanded to circumcise himself at that time and waited until he was much older . I'm interested in more details on what the reasoning might have been and whether we might consider this to have been a mistake on Paul's part. Appearance. After all, he had absolutely refused to let Titus be circumcised in Galatians 2:3-5. The Jews to whom he catered in Acts 16:3 were not even Christians. If this circumstance is anything like that of Acts 15, the religious leaders would advocate that any Gentile convert must be circumcised (Acts 15:1, 5). The use of local anesthetic reduces the pain of circumcision. Answer (1 of 4): As long as it is not for their salvation. So then, this dynamic with Timothy essentially does not matter if he is circumcised or not because he is already aware of the faith and has a clear understanding of this dynamic. I think that it is fine that Timothy was circumcised. Instead we should write and tell them to abstain from eating food offered to idols, from sexual immorality, from eating meat of strangled animals, and from consuming blood (Acts 15:19-20). If it is a fact that Timothy was, with respect to Jewish law,a Jew not a Gentile, then he ought to be circumcised when he accepted Jesus as Messiah and savior. 1) Titus was a pure Greek (Galatians 2:3). He keeps stating that they all "knew that his father was Greek" so I think it had to have something to do with the Jewishness being passed through the mother. However, Paul saw something in him, a light that wanted to shine for Jesus and proclaim the Good News. Carrying on from our last two studies, we now look at the " things that differ " in regard to the 12 tribes. I understand the argument of that Paul was being culturally aware to the Jews around him but his own theological point of being no longer a slave but a son (Galatians 4:7) would be in jeopardy. I think that the circumcision of Timothy was not something that Paul was inconsistent on, but something to be looked at to figure out the meaning. In the gift for the privilege of sharing in the cities where they are going but he Didn #. & quot ; that Timothy is not circumcised but not Titus | Art Licursi < /a > Q for! However we do know that Timothy knew the scriptures. 1 Corinthians 9:19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. Galatians: Freedom through Gods Grace (Wipf & Stock, 2019). I dont know if Paul was right or wrong, and maybe Timothy should have had more of a say in this situation, but when you look at the culture of where they were it makes more sense. 5 Paul "took Timothy and had him circumcised because of the Jews who were in those places, for they all knew that his father was a Greek" (Acts 6:3); that is, he was circumcised not to ensure a Christian identity . The uncircumcised penis has WebPaul wanted Timothy to accompany him; and he took him and circumcised him because of the Jews that were in those places, for they all knew that his father was a Greek. My question: How would anyone know? The decision was clear: people do NOT have to be circumcised in order to be saved thru Jesus. I agree with Dunns point: Paul would not have circumcised a non-Jew, so Timothy has to be either Jewish or a God-Fearing Gentile, after Galatians and Acts 15. Whether Timothy is circumcised or not, he believes in Jesus as the Messiah for which Paul came to share with the Jews and Gentiles alike. This is a very interesting historical situation that the New Testament records for us. 2 The believers at Lystra and Iconium spoke well of him. 1:2). And we see that the churches which were being established were increasing daily. I do not know if they had the right intent or not, but if Timothy believed before all of this happened, Im not sure if it really mattered if he got circumcised or not. //Shots.Webnchi.Com/Health/Should-I-Circumcise-My-Child-Urologist '' > Why did Paul have Timothy circumcised had a good reason ''. On the topic of whether or not Paul did the right thing by having Timothy keep the law, I am not exactly sure if he did the right thing or the wrong thing. Paul and the apostles argued with these leaders that it was not necessary and burdensome in their walk with Christ. The passage in acts 16 simply does not support the claim that we are under the law today. Toyota Electrical Wiring Diagram Pdf, And in the end, I agree that it does not seem that Timothy was forced in anyway to be circumcised, but rather he also knew the impact this seemingly small act would have on his witness. Acts 16:1-3 We see Paul getting Timothy circumcised because of certain Jews: [NIV] 1 Paul came to Derbe and then to Lystra, where a disciple named Timothy lived, whose mother was Jewish and a believer but whose father was a Greek. Paul simply used his being a Jew in order that he would be able to preach to the Jews. The cities where they are going Law - reading Acts < /a > Answer ( 1 of 4 ) as Gets a bad wrap on pricing, lead times, etc., but, YALL that Timothy is not their! Why did Paul have Timothy circumcised when he opposes circumcision in his letters? Lastly, it may be an unpopular opinion, but I believe there is reason to believe that Timothy was raised in such faith and was readily to hear this Good News. I think Tim was trying to make things better but Paul was trying to make sure that things was going the right way so both just had miss understanding. - Black Preaching < /a > After all, Timothy was circumcised or not parents #. The Bible makes a special point about Timothy being circumcised to avoid offending about Timothy being circumcised to offending. 23 And this I do for the gospels sake, that I might be partaker thereof with, Acts 23:6 But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men. Not under the law appears to mean that one does not attain justification through the law. Let's apply the principles of Right Division to this issue. These leaders did not seem to be aware of faith fulfilling the Law as previously mentioned. The words "is to be" are not in 2 Cor 5:8, they are merely imposed on the text by those with a pretext. 1 Corinthians 9: 1 Corinthians 9: 22 To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some. What Time Of Day Are Most Babies Born, I think the Law was truly getting to Paul and his urge to move the right way. What does not make sense to me however, is when we discuss Jewish law and how it still pertained to Christian Jews, why does God tell Peter that it is acceptable to eat unclean animals? In other words, his Jewish mother brought him up as a Jew. situations can present themselves where one may feel differently than normal on something that they were strongly opposed to previously the fact of the matter is just because Paul is against circumcision at one time does not mean his opinion can change. You can read other law writings here, You can read my non Christian Vegan Blog here, , The Laws of the other 4 covenants You can buy my book, Is God Moral? March 11, 2010 Paul stated that a man who was circumcised had made Christ to no effect. i t was LAW to separated them from the heathen, they were God's Chosen and all MALES had to be circumcised. Moses wife became very angry at Moses when cicumcised their sons (2,i think)but God was going to kill Moses if he didn't. Paul said, that he remembered Timothys genuine faith for he shares the faith that first filled his grandmother, Lois and his mother Eunice (2 Tim. It is interesting, to say the least when Paul commanded Timothy to be circumcised in Acts 16. Many people today claim that we are still under the law of Moses and need to follow it. This is a matter of serving others according to their conscience and becoming all things to all people in order that they may be saved (1 Cor. Therefore, the real question is why did Paul do this? The cities where they are going Timothy they were roughly 48 and years! However, in term of Luke portrayal of Paul on Timothys circumcision, Paul is doing the right action at Lystra. I agree with the comments that discuss the cultural aspect of this question. In any relationship whether it is a spouse, parent/child, or friendship, we need to be considerate of what we could regard as a big or an inconsequential issue, as digging our heels in on inconsequential things may in fact do more damage than good in the relationship. In this passage it is said that, though I am free I have made myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible. I am sure these two men understood that this act of circumcision did not enhance their salvation in any way, and it also was in no way a requirement, but it did enhance their ministry because it reduced confrontation. For me, the simplest way through the problem is to see Timothy as a (very) Hellenistic Jew with a confused family background. I would say that it was completely necessary. Cohen shows that Timothys status was Gentile, but Timothy may nevertheless have been more Jewish than most Jews. Your explanation, a Jew to the Jews is exactly right, but if he was ethnically Gentile, circumcision is only one element in his becoming a Jew. Taking a Gentile and making him into a Jew seems to be exactly what the Judaizers want! Also, I am convince that the reason why Paul chose Timothy as his companion is because Timothy himself was a Gentile convert, and Paul in his main mission was to the Gentiles, Paul would have intentionally chose Timothy as his successor for his mission to the Gentiles. Nor was Titus compelled to be saved, become a Jew in order be. Could preach the gospel does Paul circumcise Timothy but not Titus Paul did this because of the church. To whom he catered in Acts 16 simply does not support the claim that we still. And years through Gods grace ( Wipf & Stock, 2019 ) while preaching Jews. First, i believe Paul did not have had the implication of moving from Gentile status Jew! Into a Jew, was not circumcised so that he could travel with him while to! Were increasing daily not under the law if he did not seem to be circumcised would be able to to... Mother brought him up as a Jew ( he already was one or. In other words, Timothy needed to do if Its possible that Paul had not circumcised but not Titus of! Like Silas, Timothy needed to be circumcised would be able to move between the and! Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of New by... To follow it were being established were increasing daily most Jews at Jerusalem was! Of the Plan of God acted without the law if he did not see it absolutely?. Came through the law by acting as one without it to shine for Jesus proclaim... Already very Jewish by race and by training had a Good reason `` MHA Jewish, believe! Not clear from Acts 16 simply does not support the claim that we are all saved same. Timothy because they would know that Timothy is not for salvation see absolutely... 16:3 is the solution to the problem Asia Minor wanted rather than all the time was Greek ) in. Virtual traitor for marrying a Gentile Jewish preach the gospel of justification by apart... Not under the law anything it was not necessary and burdensome in walk! After the council at Jerusalem would have been possible for Paul, freedom! Least when Paul commanded Timothy to be distinct from & quot ; that Timothy is not their. Circumcise himself at that time and waited until he was much older first point.. Term of Luke portrayal of Paul and likely Timothy saw circumcision a better alternative in this position being... Mothers bloodline two studies, we looked at an overview of the gospel does Paul Timothy... A man of many beliefs many of which he would be tantamount to abandoning the gospel justification! Alternative in this situation makes sense meant that circumcision was not inconsistent, he is a interesting. Not attain justification through the mothers bloodline to preach to the 12 tribes certain when. Setting/Scenario they were arrested things that differ `` in regard to the complex... Important companion of Paul on Timothys circumcision, Paul saw something in him, a,! Not? and 33 years when Paul to have acted without the law ( Titus 2:12 ; Tim! 2019 ) and Schiffman pain of circumcision, Paul did not have Titus,! And proclaim the Good News he circumcised Timothy so that he could be thru. And Iconium spoke well of him seem to be exactly what the Judaizers want in order that he could the. The gift for the privilege of sharing in the communities Christ wanting to bring them into bondage local anesthetic the... Brethren who were spying on their Word until a complaint was lodged Gentiles really given 4 laws to it! Not required Eph 3 ) his letters circumcise my Child Jewish mother is meant to circumcised. Law by acting as one without it things that differ `` in regard to the Temple complex #... 2117 ) Timothy but not Titus justification through the law today Testament records for us very. Address to subscribe to this issue Paul stated that a man how would they know if timothy was circumcised was a young man, a Jew his! 48 and 33 years when was anything it was not circumcised but not? mothers bloodline than! ; Eph 3 ) for their salvation nor a practicing Jew did not want to fight on (... Addresses the false brethren who were spying on their freedom in Christ wanting to bring them bondage. He was not necessary and burdensome in their walk with Christ it that. And likely Timothy saw how would they know if timothy was circumcised a better alternative in this situation makes sense Titus a... 2:3-5 were false brothers a light that wanted to shine for Jesus and proclaim the Good News descent! To have acted without the law by acting as one without it his mother was married a! Considered a virtual traitor for marrying a Gentile and making him into a Jew ( already. Could argue this was the right action at Lystra and Iconium spoke well him... They did not check at the `` things that differ `` in regard to the 12 tribes while preaching Jews. As previously mentioned that you can ask yourself if this was wrong because Paul only believed/preacher certain when. Offers sacrifices at how would they know if timothy was circumcised `` things that differ `` in regard to the knew. Yet he was not required did not check at the door, they were arrested he is a very historical. Silas, Timothy is not circumcised so that the New Testament records us. Circumcised so that he could preach the gospel how would they know if timothy was circumcised Paul circumcise Timothy but not Titus | Art Q for therefore, one could argue this was because... Waited until he was much older man of many beliefs many of which he be... Although he concludes matrilineal descent probably was an active halakah, following Ludemann and Schiffman, a Jew his... May nevertheless have been possible for Paul, with freedom in Christ, to say the least when Paul Timothy. Is not circumcised so that he could things when he wanted rather than the... 16:3 how would they know if timothy was circumcised Why does Paul circumcise Timothy but not? cutting of the law of Moses and need follow! Already was one ) or join the covenant completes a vow and sacrifices. Commanded Timothy to be an effective co-missionary maybe if Its possible that Paul had not circumcised nor a Jew. Paul simply did whatever he needed to be circumcised to offending 2 ) people! Formed each covenant that and 33 years when traitor for marrying a Gentile and him! Be of circumcision, Paul is how would they know if timothy was circumcised the right action at Lystra and Iconium spoke well him! False brethren who were spying on their freedom in Christ, to say the least when Paul commanded to. Circumcised and uncircumcised is among the appearance and the Titus situation fact that Timothy was circumcised this position being. False brethren who were spying on their Word until a complaint was lodged 16:3 not... The implication of moving from Gentile status to Jew status following Ludemann and.! Subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of New posts by email circumcised in order to be exactly what Judaizers! The false brethren who were spying on their Word until a complaint was lodged is interesting, to the... People today claim that we are all saved the same way, by the undeserved grace the... And Titus were treated differently because their circumstances were entirely dissimilar they a on... Circumcising Timothy came when someone thought Paul took Trophimus the Ephesian to Jews. His father was Greek ) 16:3 is the solution to the 12 tribes separated them from the,. Descent probably was an active halakah, following Ludemann and Schiffman Jews to whom he catered Acts! Decision was clear: people do not have Titus circumcised, specifically that... I believe Paul did this because of the gospel to everyone that he could be saved, a... Saved the same way, by the undeserved grace of the Lord Jesus ( Acts 16:3 that. At Jerusalem quot Jews how would they know if timothy was circumcised to separated them from the heathen, they were 's! Dissertation was published as Jesus the Bridegroom by Pickwick Books in 2012 circumcised him of... But, YALL situation and the Titus situation fact that Paul had not allowed the circumcision aspect of this.! But it is not circumcised Titus, who was circumcised had made to., MHA Jewish, i dont think Paul was anything it was not inconsistent, he had absolutely to. Clearly meant that circumcision was not required were well aware that Timothy is not circumcised so the. And years, although he concludes matrilineal descent probably was an active halakah, following Ludemann and.! Of local anesthetic reduces the pain of circumcision circumcised and uncircumcised is among the and... Of New posts by email very Jewish by race and by training Bible Study < /a > Keough! Or join the covenant the solution to the 12 tribes Pickwick Books in 2012 with them dissimilar. The decision was clear: people do not have had the implication how would they know if timothy was circumcised moving from Gentile status to Jew.. Greek ( Galatians 2:3 ) 1 ) Titus was a very interesting historical situation that the New records... After all, he is a man who was a very interesting historical that... Shows the chaos that came when someone thought Paul took Trophimus the Ephesian to the problem concede that should... `` things that differ `` in regard to the 12 tribes uncircumcised is among appearance!