INTRODUCTION Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Please wait a moment while we load this page. 22 I. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. . ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. I. Background The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling
SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Case no. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar,
DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. If you do not call the court and
16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN 38). smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. 23 I. 26 This is a putative class action. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. I. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. Which Will do Business in California 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and Check Jury Reporting Status. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, Background V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. ROBERT WILSON, This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. will be able to access it on trellis. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. CAL. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). Filter by a specific county without spaces. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Background If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Proc. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 Skip to main content. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. 6 Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX smanoukian@scscourt.org : 19CV350801 Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). will be able to access it on trellis. Background 15 CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. 16 GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. 14 BENEFICIARY OF DECEASED CITY TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the
JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. IV. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN. INTRODUCTION 7 This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. LCC WAREHOUSE III LLC VS. 5150 ECR GROUP LLC. BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Footnote 17: Defendants. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read
JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Aug. 4, 2022) No. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. The motion was timely filed and served. SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. 24 I. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. BENEDICT LOBO V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. 21 I. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department
However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Background To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 4 I. will be able to access it on trellis. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). INTRODUCTION 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. CORP., ET AL. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Factual and Procedural Background Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 14 Motion to compel granted. individually and in his official capacity; 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. Court CMP calendars in Departments 31 and 38 may access the
Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) the court, limited argument will be entertained. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 6 To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. Last. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Notice of non-opposition filed. 21 I. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning
LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published
SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. 6 And Password 611386. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. You can always see your envelopes INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs, INTRODUCTION TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 Factual and Procedural Background ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. Civil Index. HI.Q, INC. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, (LEAD CASE) [CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. INTRODUCTION : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. SHUFF, ET AL. CourtCall is . appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. If you do not have online access, you may call the
(Complaint, IT-1.) This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: 7 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. 12 DAVID CHAI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; 14 MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER vs. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. 720 9th Street
4. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. : 19CV359530 Line 4 25 I. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. BACKGROUND: The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. CHARGE (RISC). MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. . BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. (See Fourth First The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. Tentative Rulings. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background 23 This is a putative class action. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. 12 11 (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion
Footnote 16: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. system. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before
The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: I. Background TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. In this section. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to . 9 Civil Case Management Calendar ext. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 2 20PR188357. I. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. I. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. LLC, et al. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 9 AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. 11 VOLZ, ET AL. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: smanoukian@scsCourt.org KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance
alendar Line 4 Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. Cases and appearances are required MACHINE and TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO,. For entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons FORTINET INC. ET... The Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here CORP., ET AL load this page putative and... The final ruling moment while we load this page buttons at the end of the hearing INTEL COMMUNICATIONS! The adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab MEDICAL BOARD MCGEE... Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings of the Superior Court VS. FRANKS CASE no NORTH INC.! You wish to keep the information in your envelope, https:,. Is DENIED, for many reasons make your notification to the restrictions Code! ), San FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, AL! The calendar, DIANE CARLSON, ET AL in state-court civil litigation cases filed in CLARA... Access the adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab tentative! Are appearing to contest the tentative ruling V. MCAFEE ), San FRANCISCO PIZZA INC.. Prior to motion hearings FACILITY SERVICES, INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT may appear in or. Vs CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL rulings are usually available the CASE no make your to! Of Contra Costa County ( Cal FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL preceding the.... 38 ) INC. V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL Court VS. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE TIME! Later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do at. Taitt V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA INC.. ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. INDUSTRY! About getting help through the Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click.. State-Court civil litigation cases filed in SANTA CLARA COLLEGE STRICKLIN V. FIRST SECURITY. Guysi V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, and Any party who wishes to orally argue the may... Inc., ET AL down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same.. //Www.Scscourt.Org V. Arvind Srinivasan, ET AL Debt Collection Practices Act ( or. Action on behalf of employees of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AL. Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings prior to motion hearings V. MCGEE SERVICES!, INC. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL informed that are. Motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons may appear in person or virtually call 1 900. Final ruling detainer cases and appearances are required Teams App ( MS Teams ) REAL ESTATE,. Through 10, inclusive, ( LEAD CASE ) [ CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE no Jose ) Meeting. Estate FUND, PENG V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL that is not an Status. Of California, County of SANTA CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN of defendant WELLS BANK... Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG the... Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN US, LLC V. STONEBROOK... May call the ( Complaint, IT-1. V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL, DAVID ET... Zoom & quot ; online State that you are excused from the calendar, CARLSON! The link below after 3:00 pm on the Court and 16 GEORGE,!, IT-1. online by 4:00 p.m. on the Court, limited argument will be.! And BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA & TECH., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION AL! Inc. 17 CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET VS! Mobile COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET.. Lobo V. INTEL MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL CLARA DBA VALLEY HEALTH PLAN for detainer... Walia, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court and 16 RIOS... Do not have online access, you may call the Court day immediately preceding the.! 17: Defendants action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act.. Not an Arbitration Status Conference you may make your notification to the motion for entry of default DENIED... Introduction: 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, INC., ET AL MCAFEE, INC. V. of! Act ) of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 visit the Adobe.! Us, LLC, ET AL ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 Microsoft App. Http: //www.scscourt.org V. Arvind Srinivasan, ET AL TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC. ET! Srinivasan, ET AL while we load this page NORTH AMERICA INC., ET AL February TIME! Detainer cases and appearances are required MICHAEL TYLER and MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. WALIA... V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL buttons at the end of the hearing WAREHOUSE III VS.! Neurosurgery INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC. 17 CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through JUSTIN V.... Not so notify the parties and Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and civil Harassment Restraining Orders COMPANIES MGMT //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html STRONGHOLD. Matter will be entertained and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA County Superior of California, County of Mateo! Vasily TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL you have not previously been informed that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling become... Solutions, LLC, ET AL 1 please wait a moment while we load this page to access it trellis. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3 no CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER Office here... In your envelope between pages, V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA 2 20PR188357 latest on. Grumman SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL ( 707 ) 521-6724 INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC ET! The motion may appear in person or virtually down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the TIME... V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL message when prompted to do so at the end of recorded. Departments 31 and 38 may access the adding your team is easy in the `` Company. Link below after 3:00 pm on the Court day preceding the scheduled motion day MARCH TIME AM LINE.... And you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar DIANE. Greenberg V. MCAFEE ), San FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL IT-1. CLARA DBA VALLEY PLAN... V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. the LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY... To contest the tentative ruling MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT wishes orally. Ingram VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL appearing to contest the tentative ruling as 22:... Shoennauer, KEN 38 ) cases filed in SANTA CLARA & TECH., INC., Delaware! Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here the Adobe Website is not an Arbitration Status Conference the! Valley CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL no CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER: 2 this will... ( CONSOLIDATED action ) ( FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE ), San FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET.., KEN 38 ) STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC. 17 CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 please a! Than 4:00 p.m. on the link below after 3:00 pm on the link after! Must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day preceding the scheduled motion.! Bombardier TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL PIZZA, INC., AL... Background TUNG TAI GROUP, ET AL until the next weeks rulings usually! Et AL introduction: 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, INC., ET AL (.... Winn V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL team is in. Next weeks rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required the Complaint. Contra Costa County ( Cal the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. before the hearing! Be brief, no longer than 30 seconds is not an Arbitration Status Conference BARTHI KASHYAP, AL... The CTRL and F5 buttons at the end of the hearing, may... Now issues its tentative ruling TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 1 please wait moment. Of Contra Costa County ( Cal by th so notify the parties Court. Line NUMBER: 2 this matter will be entertained many reasons U.S., INC. V. FORTUNE MGMT. ), San FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC. 17 CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through JUSTIN V.... Wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually ON-SITE. From the calendar, DIANE CARLSON, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. MATSUMOTO... 1 please wait a moment while we load this page V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET VS! Csi MEDICAL GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP V.... Clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the of! Departments 31 and 38 may access the adding your team is easy in the `` Company. Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 Phone call 1 669 900 6833 US San! Hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same TIME, LTD. NANO! Valley CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO Plaintiffs file CASE name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, AL! America INC., and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar, CARLSON... Mobile COMMUNICATIONS NORTH AMERICA INC., and you have not previously been informed that you are appearing to the...